S
Spartans Illustrated banner
Spartans Illustrated banner
S
SupportPrivacyTerms
© 2026 Spartans Illustrated. All rights reserved.
© 2026 Spartans Illustrated. All rights reserved.
S
SupportPrivacyTerms
S
ChatForum
Week One Toledo vs Michigan State: One question and one answer article image from Spartans Illustrated
Marvin Hall/Spartans Illustrated

Week One Toledo vs Michigan State: One question and one answer

After MSU's victory over Toledo, we examine one answer that the Spartans provided, and one question that arose heading into Week 2.

By Austen Flores
Published on September 9, 2026

Michigan State’s 30-20 win over Toledo this past weekend officially kicked off the Pat Fitzgerald era in East Lansing, and after just one game, there’s already plenty to talk about.

Expectations were generally low for the Spartans heading into the 2026 season, and while Week 1 certainly gave us some things to feel good about, I’m not sure anything happened that drastically changed my outlook just yet. There were positives, there were concerns, and there were plenty of things that will need to be answered as the schedule gets tougher.

But most importantly, football is back — and all seems right with the world.

Each week, this column will take a look back at MSU's previous game, while also looking ahead to what’s next. The goal is to identify one question that was answered by the previous week’s performance and one new question that emerged from it.

For now, Week 1 of the 2026 campaign is in the books. Let’s get into what we learned from the win over Toledo —and what we still need to find out.

Question That Was Answered

Q: Will things look and feel different under a new regime?

A: Yes — mostly.

Many questions were answered during Michigan State’s season-opening win over Toledo. After an offseason filled with speculation and unknowns, fans and analysts finally had a chance to see this new-look Spartans team in action, giving us plenty of talking points to dig into.

From the outside, or for someone who hasn’t watched much of this program over the last few years, the game and final score probably looked pretty similar to what we’ve seen before. But it wasn’t.

We could get into the specific players and schemes we wanted to see in real time, but I think what many fans really wanted was to see whether some of the coaching miscues and self-inflicted mistakes that plagued this program in recent years under Mel Tucker and Jonathan Smith would be limited.

For the most part, they were.

It was far from a perfect performance, but Michigan State started and finished the game with purpose and controlled the majority of the night outside of a few defensive breakdowns. Quarterback Alessio Milivojevic and running back Cam Edwards both looked up to par of what we thought they could be.

Under Fitzgerald and his staff in game one, MSU looked organized, did not turn the ball over and did not beat itself.

b9f7de1e-7368-4c8e-936c-8b9c4adcfade.jpg

Photo credit: Marvin Hall/Spartans Illustrated

Most importantly, the Spartans responded quickly when faced with adversity early in the fourth quarter. After Toledo suddenly found some momentum, MSU answered and eventually put the game away.

A 51-yard field goal from Liam Boyd with 1:55 remaining essentially iced the game and cemented something else that was a qurstion mark heading into the game: Michigan State has a kicker!

The Spartans also looked more disciplined, limiting the type of untimely penalties that...

S

In order to continue reading:

or

Spartans Illustrated banner